1 Chronicles 8:10

Authorized King James Version

PDF

And Jeuz, and Shachia, and Mirma. These were his sons, heads of the fathers.

Original Language Analysis

וְאֶת H853
וְאֶת
Strong's: H853
Word #: 1 of 10
properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)
יְע֥וּץ And Jeuz H3263
יְע֥וּץ And Jeuz
Strong's: H3263
Word #: 2 of 10
jeuts, an israelite
וְאֶת H853
וְאֶת
Strong's: H853
Word #: 3 of 10
properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)
שָֽׂכְיָ֖ה and Shachia H7634
שָֽׂכְיָ֖ה and Shachia
Strong's: H7634
Word #: 4 of 10
shobjah, an israelite
וְאֶת H853
וְאֶת
Strong's: H853
Word #: 5 of 10
properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely)
מִרְמָ֑ה and Mirma H4821
מִרְמָ֑ה and Mirma
Strong's: H4821
Word #: 6 of 10
mirmah, an israelite
אֵ֥לֶּה H428
אֵ֥לֶּה
Strong's: H428
Word #: 7 of 10
these or those
בָנָ֖יו These were his sons H1121
בָנָ֖יו These were his sons
Strong's: H1121
Word #: 8 of 10
a son (as a builder of the family name), in the widest sense (of literal and figurative relationship, including grandson, subject, nation, quality or
רָאשֵׁ֥י heads H7218
רָאשֵׁ֥י heads
Strong's: H7218
Word #: 9 of 10
the head (as most easily shaken), whether literal or figurative (in many applications, of place, time, rank, itc.)
אָבֽוֹת׃ of the fathers H1
אָבֽוֹת׃ of the fathers
Strong's: H1
Word #: 10 of 10
father, in a literal and immediate, or figurative and remote application

Analysis & Commentary

Genealogical Significance: This verse appears within the Benjamin and Saul's failed kingship section of Chronicles' genealogical framework. The Hebrew term בִּנְיָמִין (Binyamin) - son of the right hand is central to understanding this passage's purpose. The Chronicler, writing to post-exilic Israel (c. 450-400 BCE), uses these genealogies not merely as historical records but as theological statements about covenant continuity and divine faithfulness.

The genealogical structure serves multiple purposes:

  1. establishing Israel's connection to God's creatio n plan from Adam
  2. legitimizing post-exilic community's claim to covenant promises
  3. emphasizing Judah and Levi's special roles in God's redemptive plan,
  4. demonstrating that despite exile, God's covenant purposes continue.

The selection and arrangement of names is intentional, highlighting God's sovereign choice of leadership.

Chronicles diverges from Genesis and Samuel-Kings in its genealogical presentation, reflecting the Chronicler's distinct theological agenda. Where earlier texts focus on narrative history, Chronicles emphasizes continuity, legitimacy, and hope for restoration. This verse contributes to the larger argument that the post-exilic community is the rightful heir of God's ancient covenant promises.

Historical Context

Post-Exilic Context: The Chronicler wrote during the Persian period (450-400 BCE) to a community returned from Babylonian exile, struggling with identity and purpose. These genealogies answered crucial questions: Who are we? What is our relationship to ancient Israel? Do God's promises still apply to us?

The historical setting influences the text's emphasis on Benjamin's genealogy and Saul's lineage. Ancient Near Eastern cultures valued genealogies for establishing land rights, royal legitimacy, and tribal identity. Chronicles' genealogies served similar functions while adding theological depth. The inclusion of specific names and details reflects the author's access to temple archives, royal records, and earlier biblical texts.

Archaeological evidence from Persian-period Judah shows a small, struggling community centered around Jerusalem and the rebuilt temple. The genealogies reinforced their connection to the glorious past and provided hope for future restoration through God's covenant faithfulness.

Questions for Reflection